Gemini vs Grok for Math
Gemini decisively outperforms Grok for math, with a 94% vs 85.3% score on GPQA Diamond and a massive lead on advanced reasoning benchmarks like Humanity's Last Exam (44.7% vs 17.6%). Gemini's 1M-token context window also handles complex, lengthy math problems better than Grok's 128K tokens. If cost is paramount and you're tackling routine calculations or mid-tier problems, Grok's $8/mo tier offers decent value, but Gemini is the clear choice for serious mathematical reasoning.
Head-to-Head for Math
| Criteria | Gemini | Grok | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Accuracy | 94% on GPQA Diamond | 85.3% on GPQA Diamond | Gemini |
| Complex Problem Solving | 1M token context window | 128K token context | Gemini |
| Step-by-Step Explanations | Clear, precise walkthroughs | Capable but less rigorous | Gemini |
| Real-Time Data Integration | Limited web search | Live X/Twitter data | Grok |
| Extended Reasoning Mode | Supported for complex problems | Supported for complex problems | Tie |
Mathematical Accuracy
Gemini
94% on GPQA Diamond
Grok
85.3% on GPQA Diamond
Complex Problem Solving
Gemini
1M token context window
Grok
128K token context
Step-by-Step Explanations
Gemini
Clear, precise walkthroughs
Grok
Capable but less rigorous
Real-Time Data Integration
Gemini
Limited web search
Grok
Live X/Twitter data
Extended Reasoning Mode
Gemini
Supported for complex problems
Grok
Supported for complex problems
See Them Answer a Math Question
We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.
“Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.”
Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.
Here is the step-by-step solution to the integral, followed by the verification using differentiation.
Part 1: Solving the Integral
To solve the integral $\int x^2 \ln(x) , dx$, we will use a technique called integration by parts. The formula for integration by parts is:
Step 1: Choose $u$ and $dv$ A good rule of thumb for choosing $u$ is the acronym LIATE (Logarithmic, Inverse trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential). Since we have a Logarithmic function ($\ln(x)$) and an Algebraic function ($x^2$), we choose the logarithmic function as $u$.
Let:
- $u = \ln(x)$
- $dv = x^2 , dx$
Step 2: Find $du$ and $v$ We differentiate $u$ to find $du$, and we integrate $dv$ to find $v$:
- $du = \frac{1}{x} , dx$
- $v = \int x^2 , dx = \frac{x^3}{3}$
Step 3: Apply the integration by parts formula Substitute our chosen values into the formula:
Step 4: Simplify and solve the remaining integral Rewrite the first term and simplify the expression inside the new integral:
Pull the constant $\frac{1}{3}$ out of the integral:
Now, integrate $x^2$:
Step 5: Write the final answer Multiply the fractions and add the constant of integration, $C$:
Part 2: Verifying by Differentiation
To verify our answer, we will take the derivative of our result. If our integration is correct, taking the derivative should get us back to the original function: $x^2 \ln(x)$.
We want to find:
Step 1: Use the Product Rule for the first term For the expression $\frac{x^3}{3} \ln(x)$, we have the product of two functions, so we apply the product rule: $\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)g(x)] = f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)$.
Let $f(x) = \frac{x^3}{3}$ and $g(x) = \ln(x)$:
- $f'(x) = \frac{3x^2}{3} = x^2$
- $g'(x) = \frac{1}{x}$
Applying the product rule:
Step 2: Differentiate the remaining terms Next, we differentiate the second term, $-\frac{x^3}{9}$, and the constant, $C$:
- $\frac{d}{dx} \left[ -\frac{x^3}{9} \right] = -\frac{3x^2}{9} = -\frac{x^2}{3}$
- $\frac{d}{dx} [C] = 0$
Step 3: Combine everything Put all the differentiated parts back together:
Notice that $+ \frac{x^2}{3}$ and $- \frac{x^2}{3}$ cancel each other out:
Since the derivative of our result matches the original integrand exactly, the integration is verified as correct.
Try math tasks with both models
See Gemini and Grok answer side by side in Multichat
Detailed Breakdown
When it comes to math, both Gemini and Grok are capable tools, but they diverge meaningfully in depth, usability, and the types of problems they handle best.
Grok has built a strong reputation as a math-first AI. xAI explicitly designed Grok with hard science and quantitative reasoning as core strengths, and it shows. Grok's extended thinking mode — available on the reasoning-optimized Grok 4.1 Fast model — works through multi-step problems methodically, making it particularly well-suited for algebra, calculus, number theory, and competition-style math. Its GPQA Diamond score of 85.3% reflects solid graduate-level scientific reasoning, and it performs well on proof-based and symbolic manipulation tasks. For students working through problem sets, or anyone who needs a model that can show its work clearly and catch edge cases in derivations, Grok is a natural fit.
Gemini, however, comes in strong with benchmark numbers that are hard to ignore. Its GPQA Diamond score of 94.0% — well above Grok's 85.3% — and its Humanity's Last Exam score of 44.7% (versus Grok's 17.6%) suggest Gemini's flagship model handles expert-level mathematical reasoning at a notably higher ceiling. This matters for university-level coursework, research-adjacent work, or anyone tackling problems from fields like statistics, linear algebra, or differential equations where precision and depth both count.
Where Gemini also has a practical edge is code execution. If you're doing numerical math — running Python to verify a proof, plotting a function, or working through a data analysis problem — Gemini can execute code inline, check its own output, and iterate. Grok lacks this capability, which is a real limitation for applied math workflows.
That said, Grok's real-time web access through X/Twitter integration isn't irrelevant here either — for quickly pulling up recent contest problems or cross-checking mathematical references, it can be handy. And at $8/month via X Premium, Grok is considerably cheaper than Gemini's $20/month Advanced plan.
For most math use cases, the recommendation depends on your level. Casual learners, high schoolers, and undergraduates will find Grok highly capable and great value. But for anyone doing graduate-level math, computational work, or research-adjacent problems, Gemini's higher benchmark ceiling and code execution support make it the stronger choice. If math is your primary use case and accuracy at the hard end of the spectrum matters, Gemini earns the edge.
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Topics for Gemini vs Grok
Math Comparisons for Other Models
Try math tasks with Gemini and Grok
Compare in Multichat — freeJoin 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat