Claude vs Grok for Math
Claude significantly outperforms Grok for mathematics, with a commanding 95.6% score on AIME 2025 compared to no published benchmark for Grok on that metric, and a 4.6-point advantage on GPQA Diamond (89.9% vs 85.3%). Claude's extended thinking feature also provides an edge for complex multi-step mathematical problems that benefit from deeper reasoning. If pure math performance is your priority, Claude is the clear choice.
Head-to-Head for Math
| Criteria | Claude | Grok | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition Math (AIME Benchmark) | Dominant: 95.6% accuracy | No AIME benchmark data | Claude |
| Scientific Reasoning (GPQA) | Excellent: 89.9% accuracy | Strong: 85.3% accuracy | Claude |
| Complex Multi-step Problems | Extended thinking capability | Standard reasoning only | Claude |
| Real-time Mathematical Data | No web search | Web search included | Grok |
| Subscription Cost | $20-100/mo expensive | $8-16/mo included X | Grok |
Competition Math (AIME Benchmark)
Claude
Dominant: 95.6% accuracy
Grok
No AIME benchmark data
Scientific Reasoning (GPQA)
Claude
Excellent: 89.9% accuracy
Grok
Strong: 85.3% accuracy
Complex Multi-step Problems
Claude
Extended thinking capability
Grok
Standard reasoning only
Real-time Mathematical Data
Claude
No web search
Grok
Web search included
Subscription Cost
Claude
$20-100/mo expensive
Grok
$8-16/mo included X
See Them Answer a Math Question
We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.
“Solve this step-by-step: If f(x) = 3x² - 2x + 5, find f'(x), determine the critical points, and explain whether each is a local minimum or maximum.”
Solve this step-by-step: If f(x) = 3x² - 2x + 5, find f'(x), determine the critical points, and explain whether each is a local minimum or maximum.
Solving f(x) = 3x² - 2x + 5
Step 1: Find f'(x)
Applying the power rule to each term:
Step 2: Find Critical Points
Critical points occur where f'(x) = 0
Find the y-coordinate:
Critical Point: (1/3, 14/3)
Step 3: Classify the Critical Point
Method 1 — Second Derivative Test
Since f''(1/3) = 6 > 0, the curve is concave up → Local Minimum
Method 2 — First Derivative Sign Chart (confirmation)
| Interval | Test Value | f'(x) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| x < 1/3 | x = 0 | f'(0) = -2 < 0 | Decreasing ↘ |
| x > 1/3 | x = 1 | f'(1) = 4 > 0 | Increasing ↗ |
The function goes down then up → confirms Local Minimum ✓
Summary
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| f'(x) | 6x - 2 |
| Critical Point | x = 1/3 |
| Classification | Local Minimum |
| Minimum Value | 14/3 ≈ 4.67 |
Key Insight: Since the leading coefficient (3) is positive, this parabola opens upward, meaning the single critical point is always a global minimum, not just local.
Try math tasks with both models
See Claude and Grok answer side by side in Multichat
Detailed Breakdown
When it comes to mathematics, Claude holds a measurable edge over Grok based on benchmark performance and reasoning depth. Claude's AIME 2025 score of 95.6% places it among the top performers on competitive math benchmarks, while its GPQA Diamond score of 89.9% — compared to Grok's 85.3% — reflects stronger performance on graduate-level science and quantitative reasoning. On Humanity's Last Exam, Claude scores 33.2% versus Grok's 17.6%, a gap that becomes meaningful for users tackling university-level or research-grade math problems.
Claude's extended thinking mode is particularly valuable for math. When enabled, it works through multi-step problems systematically — showing intermediate derivations, checking its own logic, and catching errors mid-calculation. For problems like epsilon-delta proofs, differential equations, or combinatorics, this deliberate reasoning process produces more reliable results than a single-pass response. Claude also handles LaTeX formatting naturally, making it easy to copy outputs into academic papers or typesetting tools.
Grok has genuine strengths in math as well. Its real-time web search and DeepSearch features let it pull in current mathematical resources, look up theorems, or reference recent papers — something Claude cannot do natively. For students researching a topic rather than solving a specific problem, that access to live information adds real value. Grok also benefits from competitive pricing: at $8/month through X Premium, it's significantly cheaper than Claude's $20/month Pro plan, which matters for budget-conscious learners.
In practice, however, Grok's writing quality is less polished, and its explanations can feel less structured when walking through complex derivations step by step. For a student learning calculus or linear algebra, clarity of explanation matters as much as the final answer — and Claude tends to present solutions in a more pedagogically useful way.
For real-world use cases: Claude is the better choice for students working through problem sets, professionals doing quantitative analysis, or researchers needing rigorous derivations with detailed intermediate steps. Grok is a reasonable option for quick lookups, checking formulas against current sources, or users already embedded in the X ecosystem who want decent math support without an additional subscription.
Recommendation: Choose Claude for serious math work. Its benchmark scores, extended thinking, and structured explanations make it the more dependable tool when accuracy and clarity are non-negotiable. Grok is a capable backup — especially if you value real-time search — but for math specifically, Claude's depth of reasoning gives it a consistent advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Topics for Claude vs Grok
Math Comparisons for Other Models
Try math tasks with Claude and Grok
Compare in Multichat — freeJoin 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat