DeepSeek vs Kimi for Math

Kimi has a slight edge for pure math with 96.1% on AIME 2025 versus DeepSeek's 93.1%, maintaining advantages across other reasoning benchmarks like GPQA Diamond. Both models feature extended thinking for complex problems, but if math accuracy is your priority, Kimi's competitive performance justifies its marginally higher cost. DeepSeek remains the smarter choice if you value open-source accessibility and cost-efficiency alongside solid mathematical reasoning.

Head-to-Head for Math

Math competition performance (AIME 2025)

Kimi

DeepSeek

Strong 93.1% accuracy

Kimi

Superior 96.1% accuracy

Complex math reasoning (GPQA Diamond)

Kimi

DeepSeek

Solid 82.4% performance

Kimi

Better 87.6% performance

Extended thinking capability

Tie

DeepSeek

Available via R1

Kimi

Built-in feature

Cost-effectiveness

DeepSeek

DeepSeek

Most affordable option

Kimi

Higher output costs

General math knowledge (MMLU Pro)

Kimi

DeepSeek

Good 85.0% score

Kimi

Better 87.1% score

See Them Answer a Math Question

We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.

Solve this step-by-step: Find all integer solutions to x³ + y³ = z³ + 1 where x, y, z are positive integers less than 100, and explain the mathematical reasoning behind your approach.

DeepSeek V3.2

Solve this step-by-step: Find all integer solutions to x³ + y³ = z³ + 1 where x, y, z are positive integers less than 100, and explain the mathematical reasoning behind your approach.

Alright — let's solve the equation step-by-step.

We want integer solutions (x,y,z)(x, y, z) with 1x,y,z<1001 \leq x, y, z < 100 to:

x3+y3=z3+1x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 1 where x,y,zx, y, z are positive integers.


Step 1: Symmetry and ordering

The equation is symmetric in xx and yy, so we can assume xyx \leq y to avoid duplicate permutations.

Also, from x3+y3=z3+1x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 1:

If x=y=1x = y = 1, 1+1=2=z3+11 + 1 = 2 = z^3 + 1z3=1z^3 = 1z=1z = 1 (solution).

Let’s check if any solution can have zz large or small.


Step 2: Rearrange

x3+y3z3=1x^3 + y^3 - z^3 = 1

This is a cubic Diophantine equation (a special case of A3+B3+C3=1A^3 + B^3 + C^3 = 1 with one sign changed).

Known identity: (9t4)3+(19t3)3+(9t4+3t)3=1(9t^4)^3 + (1 - 9t^3)^3 + (-9t^4 + 3t)^3 = 1 but here our zz corresponds to C-C above? Not neat.

Let’s just search systematically by bounding zz.


Step 3: Bounding zz

Since x,y<100x, y < 100, maximum x3+y3<2×993=2×970299=1940598x^3 + y^3 < 2 \times 99^3 = 2 \times 970299 = 1940598.

Thus z3<19405981z^3 < 1940598 - 1z<125z < 125, already true.

But better: If xyx \leq y and zyz \geq y, then x3+y3=z3+1x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 1z3=x3+y31z^3 = x^3 + y^3 - 1. So zz is roughly (x3+y3)1/3(x^3 + y^3)^{1/3} but slightly less.

Also zyz \ge y possible? Not necessarily.


Actually let's test logically:

If zyz \ge y:
Then z3y3z^3 \ge y^3, z3=x3+y31y3z^3 = x^3 + y^3 - 1 \ge y^3x310x^3 - 1 \ge 0, true for x1x \ge 1. So zyz \ge y always possible mathematically, but z<(x3+y3)1/3z < (x^3 + y^3)^{1/3}.

Similarly, if z<yz < y, then z3<y3z^3 < y^3, so x3=z3y3+1x^3 = z^3 - y^3 + 1 ⇒ possibly x<zx < z.

We can just search with xy99x \le y \le 99 and solve for z=(x3+y31)1/3z = \lfloor (x^3 + y^3 - 1)^{1/3} \rfloor and check exactness.


Step 4: Try small values

Let’s do small (x,y)(x, y):

x=1x=1:

1+y3=z3+11 + y^3 = z^3 + 1y3=z3y^3 = z^3y=zy=z, any y=zy=z with x=1x=1 is a solution:

(1,y,y)(1, y, y) for 1y991 \le y \le 99 are solutions.

So infinite family: (1,m,m)(1, m, m) for integer m1m \ge 1 with m<100m<100.


x=2x=2:

8+y3=z3+18 + y^3 = z^3 + 1y3+7=z3y^3 + 7 = z^3z3y3=7z^3 - y^3 = 7.

Differences of cubes: (zy)(z2+zy+y2)=7(z-y)(z^2 + zy + y^2) = 7.

7 is prime ⇒ zy=1z-y = 1 and z2+zy+y2=7z^2 + zy + y^2 = 7.

If zy=1z-y=1, z=y+1z = y+1:
(y+1)2+y(y+1)+y2=y2+2y+1+y2+y+y2=3y2+3y+1=7(y+1)^2 + y(y+1) + y^2 = y^2+2y+1 + y^2+y + y^2 = 3y^2 + 3y + 1 = 7.

3y2+3y6=03y^2 + 3y - 6 = 0y2+y2=0y^2 + y - 2 = 0(y+2)(y1)=0(y+2)(y-1) = 0y=1y=1 (positive).

Then z=2z=2, x=2x=2: Check 8+1=8+18 + 1 = 8 + 1? 9=8+19 = 8+1 works: (2,1,2) but we ordered xyx\le y, so not in our search. Actually we ordered xyx \le y so x=2,y=1x=2, y=1 invalid. So for x=2x=2 case, y2y \ge 2, but the only positive yy solution is y=1y=1 from above ⇒ no solution with xyx \le y.

So no new with x=2x=2 in our ordered list.


x=3x=3:

27+y3=z3+127 + y^3 = z^3 + 1z3y3=26z^3 - y^3 = 26.

Factor: (zy)(z2+zy+y2)=26=213(z-y)(z^2+zy+y^2) = 26 = 2 \cdot 13.

Case 1: zy=1z-y=1, z2+zy+y2=26z^2+zy+y^2=26: z=y+1z=y+13y2+3y+1=263y^2+3y+1=263y2+3y25=03y^2+3y-25=0 no integer.

Case 2: zy=2z-y=2, z2+zy+y2=13z^2+zy+y^2=13: z=y+2z=y+2, (y+2)2+y(y+2)+y2=3y2+6y+4=13(y+2)^2 + y(y+2) + y^2 = 3y^2+6y+4 =133y2+6y9=03y^2+6y-9=0y2+2y3=0y^2+2y-3=0(y+3)(y1)=0(y+3)(y-1)=0y=1y=1z=3z=3. Again y<xy < x in our xyx \le y ordering (x=3, y=1 not counted).

Case z-y=13, other factor 2: z=y+13z=y+13, then z2+zy+y2=2z^2+zy+y^2=2 impossible for positive y.

Similarly z-y=26, factor 1: impossible.

So no new in ordered.


x=4x=4:

64+y3=z3+164 + y^3 = z^3 + 1z3y3=63=327z^3 - y^3 = 63 = 3^2 \cdot 7.

(zy)(z2+zy+y2)=63(z-y)(z^2+zy+y^2) = 63.

Check z-y=1: 3y2+3y+1=633y^2+3y+1=633y2+3y62=03y^2+3y-62=0 no.

z-y=3: z=y+3z=y+3, 3y2+9y+9=213y^2+9y+9=21? Wait other factor 63/3=21, so equation: 3y2+9y+9=213y^2+9y+9=213y2+9y12=03y^2+9y-12=0y2+3y4=0y^2+3y-4=0y=1y=1 or y=4y=-4. y=1y=1 ⇒ z=4 ⇒ solution (4,1,4) but y<x.

z-y=7: factor 9: 3y2+21y+49=93y^2+21y+49=9 ⇒ 3y^2+21y+40=0 no real.

z-y=9: factor 7: 3y^2+27y+81=7 ⇒ 3y^2+27y+74=0 no.

etc. No with y ≥ 4.


Actually maybe let’s check a known sporadic solution: There’s known identity:

93+103=123+19^3 + 10^3 = 12^3 + 1 Check: 729 + 1000 = 1729, 123=172812^3=1728, yes 1729 = 1728+1.

So (9,10,12) works (and symmetric (10,9,12)). With ordering: x=9,y=10,z=12x=9, y=10, z=12.


Also (9)3+103=123+1(-9)^3 + 10^3 = 12^3 + 1 but we want positive x.

Another known:
943+643=1033+194^3 + 64^3 = 103^3 + 1? Check: 830584+262144=1092728830584 + 262144 = 1092728, 1033=1092727103^3 = 1092727, yes. So (64, 94, 103) but 103 not <100, so ignore.

Also 733+1443=1503+173^3 + 144^3 = 150^3 + 1 but y,z>100.

The only small one with all <100: (9,10,12) and permutations.

Also x=1,y=zx=1, y=z we already have.


Step 5: Check systematically by search idea

We can limit search: xy<100x \le y < 100, z=round((x3+y31)1/3)z = \text{round}((x^3 + y^3 - 1)^{1/3}).

From known database: Positive solutions to x3+y3=z3+1x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 1 with xy,x,y,z<100x \le y, x,y,z<100:

  1. (1,m,m)(1, m, m) for m=1,,99m=1,\dots,99.

  2. Sporadic: (9,10,12), (10,9,12) but ordered gives (9,10,12).

Check (10,9,12) is same unordered triple as above.

Any others? Try known small solutions from taxicab-type: 1729=123+1=103+931729 = 12^3 + 1 = 10^3 + 9^3 indeed.

Let’s quickly check cube differences: x3+y3z3=1x^3 + y^3 - z^3 = 1.

For small y: if x=2: 8+y^3-z^3=1 ⇒ y^3-z^3=-7 ⇒ z^3-y^3=7, only (y,z)=(1,2) as earlier ⇒ not ordered x≤y? x=2,y=1 no.

Similarly x=6: 216+y3z3=1216 + y^3 - z^3 = 1y3z3=215y^3 - z^3 = -215z3y3=215=543z^3 - y^3 = 215 = 5 \cdot 43. Try z-y=5: 3y2+15y+25=433y^2+15y+25=433y2+15y18=03y^2+15y-18=0 ⇒ y^2+5y-6=0 ⇒ y=1, z=6 ⇒ (6,1,6) not ordered.

Seems the only with x≠1 and x≤y is (9,10,12).


Check x=8: 512+y^3 = z^3+1 ⇒ z^3-y^3=511=7×73. Try z-y=7: 3y^2+21y+49=73 ⇒ 3y^2+21y-24=0 ⇒ y^2+7y-8=0 ⇒ y=1, z=8 ⇒ (8,1,8) no.


No others likely.


Step 6: Conclusion

Positive integer solutions with x,y,z<100x, y, z < 100, ordered xyx \le y:

  1. Family: (1,m,m)(1, m, m) for m=1,2,,99m = 1, 2, \dots, 99.

  2. Sporadic: (9,10,12)(9, 10, 12).

Total count of ordered triples (x ≤ y) from family: 99 solutions.

Plus sporadic (9,10,12).

All permutations of these satisfy original equation (if we drop ordering).


(1,m,m) (1m99),(9,10,12)\boxed{(1, m, m) \ (1 \le m \le 99), \quad (9, 10, 12)}

Where the second can be permuted in x,yx, y.

Try math tasks with both models

See DeepSeek and Kimi answer side by side in Multichat

Try it yourself — free

Detailed Breakdown

Both DeepSeek and Kimi are strong contenders for mathematical work, but the benchmarks tell a clear story: Kimi holds a measurable edge across every relevant metric. On AIME 2025 — one of the most demanding math competition benchmarks available — Kimi scores 96.1% compared to DeepSeek's 93.1%. That 3-point gap may sound modest, but at this difficulty level it represents a meaningful difference in the ability to solve hard, multi-step problems. Kimi also leads on GPQA Diamond (87.6% vs 82.4%) and MMLU Pro (87.1% vs 85.0%), both of which include substantial quantitative reasoning components.

For everyday math tasks — solving equations, working through calculus problems, checking statistical analyses, or helping with homework — both models perform reliably well. DeepSeek's open-source R1 reasoning model is purpose-built for this kind of extended, chain-of-thought problem solving, and it excels at showing its work step by step. If you're a student or educator who needs detailed derivations and explanations alongside the final answer, DeepSeek R1 is a genuinely capable tool that's also free to use generously.

Where Kimi pulls ahead is in harder, more complex scenarios: competition-style problems, graduate-level proofs, multi-variable optimization, or anything requiring sustained logical precision across many steps. Its extended thinking mode and parallel sub-task coordination make it particularly good at decomposing difficult problems before solving them. For a researcher working on quantitative modeling or a developer building math-heavy applications, Kimi's higher ceiling matters.

One practical consideration: DeepSeek's API pricing is slightly cheaper (roughly $0.56 per million input tokens vs Kimi's $0.60), which may be relevant if you're running large batches of math problems programmatically. However, Kimi's output pricing is nearly double DeepSeek's ($3.00 vs $1.68 per million tokens), so for verbose, step-by-step solutions at scale, DeepSeek is the more economical choice.

Neither model supports code execution or file uploads natively, so neither can run numerical computations or process spreadsheets directly — a limitation worth noting if your workflow involves data-heavy math.

Recommendation: For most users — students, tutors, casual problem solvers — DeepSeek is more than capable and offers excellent value, especially via its free tier. But if you're tackling competition mathematics, advanced proofs, or high-stakes quantitative reasoning where accuracy is critical, Kimi's benchmark advantage is real and worth choosing for. Kimi is the stronger math model; DeepSeek is the smarter budget pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Other Topics for DeepSeek vs Kimi

Math Comparisons for Other Models

Try math tasks with DeepSeek and Kimi

Compare in Multichat — free

Join 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat