ChatGPT vs Kimi for Math
ChatGPT delivers superior mathematical reasoning (GPQA Diamond: 92.8% vs 87.6%), making it the more reliable choice for complex problem-solving. Kimi remains highly capable—evidenced by its 96.1% AIME 2025 score—while offering exceptional value with free access and lower pricing. For rigorous math work, choose ChatGPT; for learning on a budget, Kimi is excellent.
Head-to-Head for Math
| Criteria | ChatGPT | Kimi | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | Superior (92.8% GPQA) | Strong (87.6% GPQA) | ChatGPT |
| Competition Mathematics | Capable but untested | Exceptional (96.1% AIME) | Kimi |
| Complex Problem Capacity | Large (272K tokens) | Moderate (128K tokens) | ChatGPT |
| Computational Verification | Built-in code execution | No computation tools | ChatGPT |
| Cost for Math Work | $20-200/month plans | Budget-friendly API | Kimi |
Mathematical Reasoning
ChatGPT
Superior (92.8% GPQA)
Kimi
Strong (87.6% GPQA)
Competition Mathematics
ChatGPT
Capable but untested
Kimi
Exceptional (96.1% AIME)
Complex Problem Capacity
ChatGPT
Large (272K tokens)
Kimi
Moderate (128K tokens)
Computational Verification
ChatGPT
Built-in code execution
Kimi
No computation tools
Cost for Math Work
ChatGPT
$20-200/month plans
Kimi
Budget-friendly API
See Them Answer a Math Question
We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.
“Solve the integral of x²·ln(x) dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.”
Solve the integral of x²·ln(x) dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.
To solve
we use integration by parts.
Step 1: Recall the formula
Step 2: Choose and
Let
Then
Step 3: Apply integration by parts
Simplify inside the integral:
Step 4: Integrate the remaining term
So,
Final Answer
Verification by differentiation
Differentiate
Differentiate the first term
Use the product rule on :
Differentiate the second term
Add them
This matches the original integrand, so the answer is correct.
Try math tasks with both models
See ChatGPT and Kimi answer side by side in Multichat
Detailed Breakdown
When it comes to mathematics, both ChatGPT and Kimi are serious contenders, but they excel in different areas — and the right choice depends heavily on what kind of math you need help with.
Kimi's standout credential is its AIME 2025 score of 96.1%, which places it among the top-performing models on competition-level math. The American Invitational Mathematics Examination is notoriously difficult, testing deep problem-solving across algebra, geometry, number theory, and combinatorics. A near-perfect score signals that Kimi's extended thinking capabilities are genuinely optimized for multi-step mathematical reasoning. If you're a student preparing for math olympiads, tackling proof-based problems, or working through advanced coursework, Kimi handles the symbolic reasoning and logical chaining these tasks demand.
ChatGPT counters with a significant practical advantage: built-in code execution. When solving complex numerical problems — running simulations, verifying a calculus result, performing matrix operations — ChatGPT can write and execute Python on the spot. This closes the loop between formulating a solution and confirming it. A student checking whether a differential equation solution is correct, or a data analyst computing statistical models, benefits enormously from this. Kimi lacks code execution entirely, so answers involving numerical verification rest on the model's reasoning alone, which introduces more room for computational error.
On the broader science and math benchmark GPQA Diamond, ChatGPT leads with 92.8% versus Kimi's 87.6% — a meaningful gap that suggests ChatGPT has an edge in interdisciplinary STEM questions that blend mathematical reasoning with physics or chemistry.
For educators, ChatGPT's file upload feature is also useful: you can upload a worksheet, exam, or textbook page and ask for step-by-step explanations. Kimi doesn't support file uploads, limiting its usefulness in classroom or tutoring contexts where working from existing materials is common.
Pricing adds another dimension. Kimi's API is dramatically cheaper (roughly $0.60 per million input tokens vs. ChatGPT's ~$2.50), making it attractive for developers building math-focused tools or tutoring apps at scale.
Recommendation: For pure competition math and olympiad-style problem solving, Kimi is the stronger choice — its AIME performance is exceptional. For applied math, numerical computing, step-by-step tutoring with uploaded materials, and real-world problem verification, ChatGPT wins on tooling alone. Most users doing everyday math — statistics, calculus, algebra — will find ChatGPT's all-around capabilities and code execution make it the more reliable daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Topics for ChatGPT vs Kimi
Math Comparisons for Other Models
Try math tasks with ChatGPT and Kimi
Compare in Multichat — freeJoin 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat