ChatGPT vs Qwen for Math
Qwen edges out ChatGPT for pure mathematics with a standout 91.3% AIME 2025 score, making it the superior choice for competitive math and formal problem-solving. ChatGPT remains competitive on broader STEM tasks and offers more versatility across disciplines, but Qwen's dramatic cost advantage ($0.40/$2.40 per million tokens vs $2.50/$15.00) makes it the obvious pick if math is your primary use case.
Head-to-Head for Math
| Criteria | ChatGPT | Qwen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | Superior (GPQA 92.8%) | Strong (GPQA 88.4%) | ChatGPT |
| Competition Math Performance | No benchmark published | Excellent (AIME 91.3%) | Qwen |
| Code Execution for Calculations | Built-in capability | Not available | ChatGPT |
| Extended Thinking for Complex Problems | Available | Available | Tie |
| Cost for Math Users | Expensive ($2.50/$15 per 1M) | Very affordable ($0.40/$2.40 per 1M) | Qwen |
Mathematical Reasoning
ChatGPT
Superior (GPQA 92.8%)
Qwen
Strong (GPQA 88.4%)
Competition Math Performance
ChatGPT
No benchmark published
Qwen
Excellent (AIME 91.3%)
Code Execution for Calculations
ChatGPT
Built-in capability
Qwen
Not available
Extended Thinking for Complex Problems
ChatGPT
Available
Qwen
Available
Cost for Math Users
ChatGPT
Expensive ($2.50/$15 per 1M)
Qwen
Very affordable ($0.40/$2.40 per 1M)
See Them Answer a Math Question
We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.
“Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.”
Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.
To solve
we use integration by parts.
Step 1: Recall the formula
Step 2: Choose and
Let
Then compute:
and
Step 3: Apply integration by parts
Substitute:
Simplify inside the integral:
Now integrate:
So,
Final answer
Verification by differentiation
Differentiate
Differentiate the first term
Use the product rule on :
Differentiate the second term
Add the results
This matches the original integrand, so the answer is verified.
If you want, I can also show a quick shortcut for choosing in integration by parts.
Try math tasks with both models
See ChatGPT and Qwen answer side by side in Multichat
Detailed Breakdown
When it comes to mathematics, both ChatGPT and Qwen are capable tools — but they have meaningfully different strengths depending on whether you need step-by-step tutoring, competitive problem-solving, or applied numerical work.
Qwen has a standout advantage in pure mathematical reasoning. Its AIME 2025 score of 91.3% is exceptional, placing it among the top-performing models on competition-style math. If you're working through olympiad problems, university-level proofs, or high-difficulty algebra and calculus, Qwen's extended thinking mode handles multi-step reasoning with impressive depth and accuracy. Its cost structure also makes it practical for heavy, repeated use — such as batch-processing problem sets or running iterative calculations via API.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, brings a more complete environment for applied math work. Its code execution capability is a significant differentiator: you can ask it to solve a differential equation symbolically and then immediately run a numerical verification in Python, all within the same conversation. File uploads let you drop in a spreadsheet or dataset and have ChatGPT perform statistical analysis, compute regressions, or flag anomalies. For students doing homework, professionals building financial models, or researchers doing data-heavy work, this integrated toolchain is hard to beat. ChatGPT's GPQA Diamond score of 92.8% also signals strong performance on graduate-level science and quantitative reasoning questions.
In practice, the choice often comes down to the type of math involved. For pure problem-solving — proofs, competition math, symbolic manipulation — Qwen is the stronger pick, and its free tier makes it accessible for students. For applied math that involves computation, visualization, or working with real data, ChatGPT's code interpreter gives it a clear edge. A physicist checking a derivation might prefer Qwen; a data analyst building a forecast model would be better served by ChatGPT.
One area where ChatGPT has a notable advantage is in explaining math clearly. Its conversational polish and ability to adapt explanations to different skill levels make it the better tutoring tool for beginners or anyone who needs concepts broken down intuitively. Qwen can explain too, but the experience is less consistent.
Recommendation: If your primary use is high-level mathematical problem-solving or you want a cost-effective tool for rigorous quantitative work, Qwen is the stronger choice. If you need math integrated with computation, data analysis, or accessible tutoring, ChatGPT is the better fit. For most students and professionals, ChatGPT's all-in-one environment wins on practicality — but Qwen's raw math performance is genuinely impressive and worth using when the problem demands it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Topics for ChatGPT vs Qwen
Math Comparisons for Other Models
Try math tasks with ChatGPT and Qwen
Compare in Multichat — freeJoin 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat