ChatGPT vs Qwen for Math

Qwen edges out ChatGPT for pure mathematics with a standout 91.3% AIME 2025 score, making it the superior choice for competitive math and formal problem-solving. ChatGPT remains competitive on broader STEM tasks and offers more versatility across disciplines, but Qwen's dramatic cost advantage ($0.40/$2.40 per million tokens vs $2.50/$15.00) makes it the obvious pick if math is your primary use case.

Head-to-Head for Math

Mathematical Reasoning

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Superior (GPQA 92.8%)

Qwen

Strong (GPQA 88.4%)

Competition Math Performance

Qwen

ChatGPT

No benchmark published

Qwen

Excellent (AIME 91.3%)

Code Execution for Calculations

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Built-in capability

Qwen

Not available

Extended Thinking for Complex Problems

Tie

ChatGPT

Available

Qwen

Available

Cost for Math Users

Qwen

ChatGPT

Expensive ($2.50/$15 per 1M)

Qwen

Very affordable ($0.40/$2.40 per 1M)

See Them Answer a Math Question

We asked both models the same math-focused prompt.

Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.

GPT-5.4

Solve the integral ∫(x²·ln(x))dx step by step, then verify your answer by differentiating the result.

To solve

x2ln(x)dx\int x^2 \ln(x)\,dx

we use integration by parts.

Step 1: Recall the formula

udv=uvvdu\int u\,dv = uv - \int v\,du

Step 2: Choose uu and dvdv

Let

u=ln(x),dv=x2dxu=\ln(x), \qquad dv=x^2\,dx

Then compute:

du=1xdxdu=\frac{1}{x}\,dx

and

v=x2dx=x33v=\int x^2\,dx=\frac{x^3}{3}

Step 3: Apply integration by parts

x2ln(x)dx=uvvdu\int x^2\ln(x)\,dx = uv-\int v\,du

Substitute:

x2ln(x)dx=ln(x)x33x331xdx\int x^2\ln(x)\,dx = \ln(x)\cdot \frac{x^3}{3} - \int \frac{x^3}{3}\cdot \frac{1}{x}\,dx

Simplify inside the integral:

=x3ln(x)313x2dx= \frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3} - \frac{1}{3}\int x^2\,dx

Now integrate:

x2dx=x33\int x^2\,dx=\frac{x^3}{3}

So,

x2ln(x)dx=x3ln(x)313x33+C\int x^2\ln(x)\,dx = \frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3} - \frac{1}{3}\cdot \frac{x^3}{3} + C

=x3ln(x)3x39+C= \frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3} - \frac{x^3}{9} + C

Final answer

x2ln(x)dx=x3ln(x)3x39+C\boxed{\int x^2\ln(x)\,dx=\frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3}-\frac{x^3}{9}+C}


Verification by differentiation

Differentiate

F(x)=x3ln(x)3x39F(x)=\frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3}-\frac{x^3}{9}

Differentiate the first term

Use the product rule on x3ln(x)x^3\ln(x):

ddx(x3ln(x)3)=13(3x2ln(x)+x31x)\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{x^3\ln(x)}{3}\right) = \frac{1}{3}\left(3x^2\ln(x)+x^3\cdot \frac{1}{x}\right)

=13(3x2ln(x)+x2)= \frac{1}{3}\left(3x^2\ln(x)+x^2\right)

=x2ln(x)+x23= x^2\ln(x)+\frac{x^2}{3}

Differentiate the second term

ddx(x39)=3x29=x23\frac{d}{dx}\left(-\frac{x^3}{9}\right)=-\frac{3x^2}{9}=-\frac{x^2}{3}

Add the results

F(x)=(x2ln(x)+x23)x23F'(x)=\left(x^2\ln(x)+\frac{x^2}{3}\right)-\frac{x^2}{3}

F(x)=x2ln(x)F'(x)=x^2\ln(x)

This matches the original integrand, so the answer is verified.

F(x)=x2ln(x)\boxed{F'(x)=x^2\ln(x)}

If you want, I can also show a quick shortcut for choosing uu in integration by parts.

Try math tasks with both models

See ChatGPT and Qwen answer side by side in Multichat

Try it yourself — free

Detailed Breakdown

When it comes to mathematics, both ChatGPT and Qwen are capable tools — but they have meaningfully different strengths depending on whether you need step-by-step tutoring, competitive problem-solving, or applied numerical work.

Qwen has a standout advantage in pure mathematical reasoning. Its AIME 2025 score of 91.3% is exceptional, placing it among the top-performing models on competition-style math. If you're working through olympiad problems, university-level proofs, or high-difficulty algebra and calculus, Qwen's extended thinking mode handles multi-step reasoning with impressive depth and accuracy. Its cost structure also makes it practical for heavy, repeated use — such as batch-processing problem sets or running iterative calculations via API.

ChatGPT, on the other hand, brings a more complete environment for applied math work. Its code execution capability is a significant differentiator: you can ask it to solve a differential equation symbolically and then immediately run a numerical verification in Python, all within the same conversation. File uploads let you drop in a spreadsheet or dataset and have ChatGPT perform statistical analysis, compute regressions, or flag anomalies. For students doing homework, professionals building financial models, or researchers doing data-heavy work, this integrated toolchain is hard to beat. ChatGPT's GPQA Diamond score of 92.8% also signals strong performance on graduate-level science and quantitative reasoning questions.

In practice, the choice often comes down to the type of math involved. For pure problem-solving — proofs, competition math, symbolic manipulation — Qwen is the stronger pick, and its free tier makes it accessible for students. For applied math that involves computation, visualization, or working with real data, ChatGPT's code interpreter gives it a clear edge. A physicist checking a derivation might prefer Qwen; a data analyst building a forecast model would be better served by ChatGPT.

One area where ChatGPT has a notable advantage is in explaining math clearly. Its conversational polish and ability to adapt explanations to different skill levels make it the better tutoring tool for beginners or anyone who needs concepts broken down intuitively. Qwen can explain too, but the experience is less consistent.

Recommendation: If your primary use is high-level mathematical problem-solving or you want a cost-effective tool for rigorous quantitative work, Qwen is the stronger choice. If you need math integrated with computation, data analysis, or accessible tutoring, ChatGPT is the better fit. For most students and professionals, ChatGPT's all-in-one environment wins on practicality — but Qwen's raw math performance is genuinely impressive and worth using when the problem demands it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Other Topics for ChatGPT vs Qwen

Math Comparisons for Other Models

Try math tasks with ChatGPT and Qwen

Compare in Multichat — free

Join 10,000+ professionals who use Multichat