Ask questions like this to multiple AIs at once

Try free

What are good ways to learn how to do competitor analysis in SEO?

Competitor analysis in SEO is essentially the practice of reverse-engineering why your rivals rank where they do, then using those insights to inform your own strategy. It’s less about “copying” and more about understanding the competitive landscape of search intent—what Google actually rewards in your specific niche.

Here’s a structured approach to learning this skill, moving from foundational concepts to practical execution.


1. First, Learn to Identify "True" SEO Competitors

Before analyzing, you must recognize that your business competitors ≠ your SEO competitors.

  • A business competitor sells the same product (e.g., you both sell organic dog food).
  • An SEO competitor ranks for the same keywords you want to target (e.g., a veterinary blog ranking for “best organic dog food” even though they don’t sell it).

How to learn this:
Practice “SERP reconnaissance.” Search your target keywords in an incognito/private window. Map who appears in the top 10. You’ll often find publishers, affiliates, or informational sites dominating queries you assumed were transactional. This changes your entire analysis framework.


2. Master the Four Pillars of Analysis

Don’t just “look at their site.” Break competitor analysis into four learnable disciplines:

A. Keyword Gap Analysis

Learning to find what they rank for that you don’t.

  • Concept: The "keyword gap" reveals hidden opportunities—long-tail variations, question-based queries, or lateral topics.
  • How to practice: Use tools like Ahrefs’ Content Gap or SEMrush’s Keyword Gap. Input 3-4 competitors and your domain. Look for keywords where all competitors rank, but you don’t (the "Missing" filter).
  • Skill to develop: Learning to distinguish between relevant gaps (aligned with your audience) and irrelevant volume traps.

B. Backlink Profile Analysis

Understanding authority and networks.

  • Concept: It’s not just about quantity; it’s about link velocity (how fast they acquire links), anchor text distribution, and referring domain quality.
  • How to practice: Pick one competitor. Export their referring domains. Categorize them: Editorial (news mentions), Resource (listicles/tools), Guest posts, Directories. Look for patterns. Do they get links through original research? Data studies? Strategic partnerships?

C. Content Architecture & Gap Analysis

Analyzing how they satisfy intent, not just what they say.

  • Concept: Look at content depth, multimedia usage, internal linking structures, and content freshness cadence.
  • How to practice: Create a "SERP Features" spreadsheet. For a target keyword, note: Do competitors use video? Do they have FAQ schema? Is the content 2,000 words or a concise 800? This teaches you the "format" Google prefers for specific intents.

D. Technical & UX Benchmarking

The invisible advantages.

  • Concepts to study: Core Web Vitals comparison, site architecture (how many clicks from home to deep content), mobile usability, and internal linking density.
  • Tool practice: Use Screaming Frog (free for 500 URLs) to crawl a competitor’s site. Look at their URL structure, header tag hierarchy, and metadata patterns.

3. Develop a Replicable Framework

Don’t analyze randomly. Use a template to build the muscle memory.

The “One-Page” Competitor Tear-Down Exercise: Pick one competitor and fill out this template manually (doing it manually first teaches you more than automated reports):

  1. Top 3 Traffic Pages: What specific pages drive their organic traffic? (Use SimilarWeb or Ahrefs Top Pages)
  2. Content Moat: What unique asset do they have that’s hard to replicate? (Original data? Free tool? Extensive glossary?)
  3. Linkable Assets: What content earned them the most backlinks?
  4. Weakness Scan: Where do they fail? (Thin content on certain topics? Slow pages? Missing recent query trends?)

4. Learn Through Replication (The “Shadow Campaign”)

The best way to learn is to pick a small niche or a hobby site you own and attempt to outrank a specific competitor for one keyword.

  • Pick a low-competition long-tail keyword.
  • Analyze the #1 result completely (content, backlinks, speed).
  • Create something objectively better (the “10x content” approach).
  • Attempt to replicate their backlink profile for that page.

This forces you to confront the difference between theoretical analysis and execution.


5. Resources & Communities

  • Free Courses: Moz’s “SEO Competitive Analysis” course; Ahrefs’ YouTube channel (specifically their “SERP Analysis” videos).
  • Blogs: Backlinko’s guides on competitor keyword research; Siege Media’s content gap methodologies.
  • Communities: The r/TechSEO or r/bigseo subreddits often have teardown case studies. Traffic Think Tank (paid) has deep-dive templates.
  • Newsletters: “Detailed.com” by Glen Allsopp specializes inreverse-engineering SEO success stories.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid While Learning

  • Analysis Paralysis: Don’t analyze 10 competitors at once. Start with one direct competitor and one aspirational competitor (the big brand you want to become).
  • Static Analysis: SEO moves fast. A competitor analysis from 6 months ago is archaeology, not intelligence. Learn to set up monitoring (Google Alerts for their brand + new backlinks).
  • Ignoring Search Intent: Seeing a competitor ranks #1 with a listicle and trying to rank a product page for the same keyword is a misunderstanding of the analysis.

Where would you like to go deeper?

Since competitor analysis is a broad skill, I could expand on:

  1. Specific tools workflows: Step-by-step how to use free tools (Google Search Console + free Ahrefs/SEMrush tiers) if you have a limited budget?
  2. Niche-specific tactics: Are you in e-commerce, SaaS, local SEO, or affiliate content? Each requires different competitive signals.
  3. Link building outreach: How to actually use competitor backlink data to find prospects for your own site?

What type of site or industry are you analyzing competitors for? That context would help me tailor the methodology significantly.