Ask questions like this to multiple AIs at once

Try free

What are the best formats for a resume?

The "best" resume format depends entirely on your career story, industry, and application method. A format that gets a graphic designer hired might get a finance professional rejected.

Here’s how to understand the landscape and choose strategically:

The Three Core Resume Formats

1. Reverse-Chronological (The Standard)

What it is: Lists work history from newest to oldest, emphasizing job titles, companies, and dates.

Why use it:

  • Universally preferred by recruiters (they expect it)
  • ATS-friendly (Applicant Tracking Systems parse it easily)
  • Shows career trajectory and loyalty clearly

Best for: People with steady employment history in the same field, traditional industries (finance, law, healthcare, engineering), and those climbing a clear ladder.

The risk: Highlights employment gaps and frequent job changes prominently.


2. Functional (Skills-Based)

What it is: Leads with skill categories (e.g., "Project Management," "Data Analysis") rather than work history. Employment history appears as a brief list at the bottom.

Why use it:

  • Minimizes employment gaps or frequent moves
  • Emphasizes transferable skills for career changers
  • Useful for freelancers/consultants with scattered project work

The risk: High. Many recruiters assume you're hiding something. Most ATS systems struggle to parse functional formats, and they often reject them automatically. Use only when absolutely necessary.


3. Combination/Hybrid (The Strategic Choice)

What it is: Opens with a robust skills summary or "Career Highlights" section, followed by reverse-chronological work history.

Why use it:

  • Gives senior professionals (10+ years) room to showcase achievements before listing every job since 2005
  • Works well for people with diverse experience that needs context
  • Balances keywords (for ATS) with narrative (for humans)

Best for: Mid-to-senior level professionals, career changers with some relevant experience, and those with both deep expertise and impressive job titles.

Modern Format Rules (Beyond Structure)

The ATS Reality

Most companies use Applicant Tracking Systems that scan resumes before humans see them. Your beautiful two-column design with graphics? The ATS might read it as gibberish.

ATS-friendly formatting:

  • Single column (mostly)
  • Standard fonts (Arial, Calibri, Garamond)
  • No headers/footers with important info (ATS often strips them)
  • Standard section headings ("Work Experience," not "My Journey")
  • Saved as .docx or PDF (PDF is safer now, but some older ATS prefer Word)

The "F-Pattern" & Recruiter Behavior

Recruiters spend 6-7 seconds on initial scans. They read in an F-pattern: top of page, left side, across occasionally.

Format for this:

  • Top third of page: Most critical real estate. Put your strongest value proposition here (summary + key skills or most recent impressive role).
  • White space is your friend: Dense blocks of text get skipped. Use bullet points (3-5 per role).
  • Consistency: If you bold company names, bold them all. Inconsistency signals sloppiness.

Industry Nuances

  • Creative fields (design, writing, marketing): Can break "rules" with visual elements, but always have a plain-text/ATS version ready
  • Academia/CV: Chronological is king, but length expands (2+ pages accepted)
  • Tech: Skills section must be prominent; GitHub/portfolio links essential
  • Government/Federal: Must follow USAJOBS format precisely or get auto-rejected

The "One-Page vs. Two-Page" Debate

  • Entry-level (0-5 years): One page. No exceptions.
  • Mid-career (5-15 years): One page preferred, two acceptable if second page is 1/3 full or more
  • Senior/Executive (15+ years): Two pages standard; three only for CVs/academia

How to Choose Your Format

Use this decision tree:

  1. Are you staying in the same field with no major gaps? → Reverse-chronological
  2. Are you changing careers AND have some relevant experience? → Hybrid/Combination
  3. Are you changing careers AND have zero relevant experience OR have 3+ years of gaps? → Functional (but be aware of the risks; consider a "Modified Hybrid" instead where skills get 20% of page, not 50%)

The "Modified Hybrid" Safety Net: If tempted to go functional, try this instead: Keep the reverse-chronological structure, but add a "Relevant Experience" subsection at the top with 2-3 bullet points of transferable achievements, then list full history below.


What would help you narrow this down?

I could expand on:

  • Specific formatting for your industry (tech, healthcare, creative, etc.)
  • ATS optimization techniques if you're applying to large corporations
  • How to format employment gaps or career transitions elegantly
  • Visual templates that balance aesthetics with machine readability

What does your career situation look like—are you maintaining a trajectory, changing fields, or navigating gaps?