Ask questions like this to multiple AIs at once

Try free

What is a list of good frameworks to create a strategic partnership proposal among two unrelated companies?

Here are six actionable frameworks tailored for unrelated companies (where obvious synergy isn't apparent), ranging from strategic discovery to proposal execution:


1. The Complementary Value Matrix (Strategic Discovery)

Best for: Finding hidden connection points between disparate industries.

Step-by-Step:

  1. Map Core Assets (Column A): List Company A's underutilized assets (data, real estate, trust/brand, distribution, IP)
  2. Map Critical Friction (Column B): List Company B's biggest pain points or customer drop-off points
  3. Intersection Hunt: Draw lines between assets and frictions where Company A's excess could solve Company B's shortage without competing
  4. Mutualization Score: Rate each intersection 1-10 on (a) Effort to integrate, (b) Risk of brand dilution, (c) Revenue potential

Example: A cybersecurity firm (A) + a luxury hotel chain (B). Intersection: Hotel guests worry about Wi-Fi safety; Cybersecurity firm needs high-trust brand association. Asset = security expertise; Friction = guest anxiety about digital amenities.


2. The PARTNER Proposal Framework (Document Structure)

Best for: Writing the actual proposal deck when industries differ.

Structure your deck exactly in this order:

  • Problem Agnostic: Start with the macro trend affecting both industries (e.g., "Gen Z expects seamless digital-physical experiences")
  • Asset Audit: "You have X, we have Y—neither can solve [trend] alone"
  • Risk Reversal: Address the "unrelated" objection head-on—explain why distance reduces cannibalization risk
  • Testable Hypothesis: Propose a 90-day pilot with specific, low-cost metrics—not a 3-year integration
  • Non-Compete Boundaries: Explicitly map where each company stops and starts to prevent turf wars
  • Economic Model: 3 scenarios (Conservative/Moderate/Aggressive) showing revenue split vs. cost split
  • Roadmap: 30-60-90 day activation plan

3. The Ecosystem Bridge Method (Strategic Narrative)

Best for: Justifying the partnership to skeptical boards/investors who see no connection.

Steps:

  1. Customer Journey Overlay: Map a day-in-the-life of Company A's customer and Company B's customer—find the temporal or contextual overlap (e.g., "Morning routine" for coffee + fitness app)
  2. The Third Space: Identify the "white space" between your industries where neither currently operates but both have permission to play
  3. Bridge Narrative: Frame the partnership as building infrastructure in that white space, not invading each other's territory

Template: "While [Company A] owns the [X] moment and [Company B] owns the [Y] moment, together we can capture the underserved [Z] transition point."


4. The 3-Lens Partnership Model (Due Diligence)

Best for: Assessing fit before writing the proposal.

Analyze through three specific lenses:

  • Capability Lens: What can Company A do that Company B would need 18 months and $X to build? (Focus on speed-to-capability)
  • Capital Lens: Where is Company B spending inefficiently that Company A's infrastructure could reduce by 30%+? (Focus on cost arbitrage)
  • Customer Lens: Which of Company A's customer segments is Company B desperate to reach, but can't due to channel conflict? (Focus on access without competition)

Action: Only proceed if you score 7+ on at least two lenses.


5. The Zero-Based Partnership Canvas (Co-Creation)

Best for: Workshops where both leadership teams design the partnership together (not top-down).

The Canvas Sections (fill out together):

  1. Shared Enemy: What industry problem hurts both? (e.g., "Fragmented customer experience")
  2. Combined Superpower: What becomes possible only when your data/tech/networks combine?
  3. Isolated Risks: What must each company protect at all costs? (Write these as guardrails, not obstacles)
  4. Revenue Architecture: New revenue (co-created product) vs. Efficiency revenue (shared cost savings) vs. Strategic revenue (data/options value)
  5. Exit Triggers: Agree upfront on metrics that kill the partnership (prevents long-term entanglement of unrelated businesses)

6. The Pilot-Scale-Exit Roadmap (Execution Framework)

Best for: Managing the operational risk of combining unrelated cultures/systems.

Phase 1: The Dating Phase (Month 1-3)

  • Shared API or data experiment only
  • No co-branding yet
  • Success metric: Technical feasibility + 1 surprise insight about customer overlap

Phase 2: The Handshake (Month 4-9)

  • Limited co-branded offering to 5-10% of customer base
  • Joint governance committee with veto powers for both sides
  • Success metric: Net Promoter Score impact > Revenue (test brand permission)

Phase 3: The Integration (Month 10+)

  • Only if Phases 1-2 hit metrics
  • Build shared OKRs, not just shared P&L

Which Should You Use First?

If you're still convincing internal stakeholders → Start with Ecosystem Bridge Method (Framework #3) to build the narrative.

If you have buy-in but need to write the deck → Use PARTNER Framework (#2) for structure + Complementary Value Matrix (#1) for the content.

If the other company thinks you're competitors → Lead with 3-Lens Model (#4) to prove you're complementary, not competitive.


To help you apply these immediately:

  1. What industries are the two companies in? (I can map a specific Complementary Value Matrix for you)
  2. Who initiated the conversation—you or them? (This determines whether you lead with value-giving or value-receiving frameworks)
  3. Is this primarily about: (a) Access to new customers, (b) Shared technology/IP, or (c) Operational efficiency/cost reduction? (Different frameworks work better for each objective)

Which of these six feels closest to your current situation?