Ask questions like this to multiple AIs at once

Try free

What do recruiters look for in a job applicant's resume?

What recruiters look for depends heavily on context—industry, seniority level, and role type all matter—but there are universal principles rooted in how recruiters actually work. Understanding their workflow helps explain why some resumes succeed while others get rejected in seconds.

The Recruiter's Reality (The "Why")

Before diving into content, understand the operational constraints:

  • Volume: Corporate recruiters often review 100–200+ resumes per opening; agency recruiters may scan thousands weekly.
  • Speed: Initial screening takes 6–30 seconds. They're not reading; they're pattern-matching against a job req.
  • ATS First: 75% of resumes never reach human eyes. They're parsed by Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) searching for keywords, tenure, and location before a recruiter sees them.

What They Actually Scan For

1. Immediate Relevance (The "Above the Fold" Test)

Recruiters look at the top third of your resume first—both literally on the page and in the ATS preview.

  • Target Title: Does your headline/target role match the job title they're filling? (e.g., "Senior Product Manager" vs. just "Seeking New Opportunities")
  • Location/Work Authorization: Are you local or willing to relocate? Do you need sponsorship?
  • Tenure Patterns: Quick scan for job-hopping (multiple <1 year stints) or unexplained gaps

2. Impact Over Activity

Recruiters don't care what you were supposed to do; they care what you actually achieved.

Weak: "Responsible for managing social media accounts and creating content calendars" Strong: "Grew Instagram following 340% (12K→53K) and increased engagement rate from 1.2% to 4.7% through data-driven content strategy"

They look for:

  • Quantified outcomes: Percentages, dollar amounts, time saved, team size managed
  • Business context: Scale ("$1M pipeline," "fortune 500 clients," "cross-functional team of 12")
  • Verb choice: "Architected," "spearheaded," "optimized" signals ownership; "assisted with," "participated in" signals support roles

3. Keyword Alignment (ATS Optimization)

Recruiters configure ATS filters for must-have skills. They scan for:

  • Hard skills: Python, GAAP accounting, Salesforce administration, phlebotomy certification
  • Industry jargon: "Cap table management" (startups), "GMP compliance" (pharma), "OMO campaigns" (marketing)
  • Tools/Stack: Specific software versions, methodologies (Agile/Scrum), or compliance frameworks

Context matters: A project manager applying to a tech company needs "Jira" or "Confluence"; applying to construction needs "Procore" or "Bluebeam."

4. Career Trajectory & Logic

Recruiters look for narrative coherence:

  • Progression: Increasing scope, title changes, responsibility growth (even within the same company)
  • Pivots explained: If you're switching industries, is there a bridge (transferable skills, certification, side projects)?
  • Employment gaps addressed: A brief explanation ("Caregiver leave 2022–2023" or "Independent consulting 2021") prevents assumptions

5. Red Flags (Auto-Reject Triggers)

  • Short tenures without context: Three jobs in two years suggests retention risk unless labeled "Contract" or "Project-based"
  • Functional resumes (skills-based without chronology): Often used to hide gaps or lack of experience—immediately suspicious
  • Dense blocks of text: If it looks like work to read, it gets skipped
  • Mismatched seniority: Applying to Director roles with Coordinator experience suggests either spam application or lack of self-awareness

Formatting: The Unconscious Filter

Recruiters make snap judgments based on visual hierarchy:

✓ What helps:

  • Clean, scannable layout: 10–12pt font, consistent spacing, clear section headers
  • Reverse chronology: Current job first (standard expectation)
  • White space: Margins ≥0.5", breathing room between bullets
  • Standard file types: PDF (preserves formatting) or .docx (if requested)

✗ What hurts:

  • Graphics/Tables/Columns: ATS systems often garble these, turning your resume into gibberish
  • Photos/icons: Waste space, introduce bias risk, and confuse parsers
  • "Creative" designs (unless you're a designer): Fancy templates often sacrifice readability for aesthetics

The "So What?" Test

When reviewing bullet points, recruiters mentally ask: "So what? How did this change the business?"

Before: "Redesigned the onboarding process for new hires" After recruiter asks "So what?": "...which reduced time-to-productivity by 3 weeks and improved 90-day retention by 22%"

If your resume answers "So what?" within the bullet, you pass.


Industry Nuances

  • Tech: GitHub links, specific stack matches, system design experience
  • Finance: Series licenses, audit clean records, deal value sizes
  • Healthcare: License numbers, patient volume, EMR system proficiency
  • Creative fields: Portfolio links (but the resume itself should still be clean/text-based for ATS)

Would you like me to dive deeper into any of these areas? For example:

  • How to frame a career transition or employment gap?
  • ATS optimization strategies for your specific industry?
  • How to quantify achievements when you don't have access to revenue data?
  • Resume strategies for entry-level vs. executive roles?

Or if you'd like, share what field you're in, and I can give you a targeted "recruiter scan checklist" for your specific sector.